Indicator
Corruption proofing of legislation
Implemented
Not Implemented
Not Applicable
| Level | ALB | BIH | KOS | MNE | MKD | SRB |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Corruption proofing is implemented regularly with sufficient resources. | ||||||
| Recommendations obtained from corruption proofing legislation have led to relevant changes in legislation. | ||||||
| Responsibilities for proofing implementation are clearly defined. *Partially | ||||||
| National legislation foresees corruption proofing of legislation. *Not yet adopted but under development | ||||||
| All laws and by-laws are potentially subject to corruption proofing. | ||||||
| Corruption proofing skills are transferred to the majority of central authorities (e.g. ministries, independent agencies and other regulatory bodies). | ||||||
| Public authorities engage civil society in corruption proofing. | ||||||
| The majority of laws and governmental normative acts are corruption proofed. | ||||||
| The proofing practice has been evaluated independently and found to be contributing significantly to reducing corruption risks. |
Note that for Bosnia and Herzegovina, “State” stands for the state level, while “FBiH” stands for the Federation of Bosnia and Herzegovina and “RS” stands for Republika Srpska - the two entities of Bosnia and Herzegovina. Note that the presented scoring criteria system is not a full representation of the scoring methodology used to determine the score for an indicator. For more information, see the Methodology section.