Indicator
Specialised anti-corruption prosecutorial and judicial bodies
Implemented
Not Implemented
Not Applicable
| Level | ALB | BIH | KOS | MNE | MKD | SRB |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| The body ensures reporting and publication of detailed performance statistics. | ||||||
| The procedures for selecting, appointing and dismissing the head of the body comprise safeguards against arbitrariness and ensure public accountability. *Only usual procedures as for units of the Prosecutor’s Office | ||||||
| Adequate human resources and a stable or increasing annual budget are in place to ensure the functioning of the body. | ||||||
| The body has full powers to support, supervise and/or lead investigations and exercise prosecution. | ||||||
| A specialised anti-corruption prosecutorial body, or several, have been established. *Not yet established but under development. | ||||||
| The majority of the staff received training over the past two years. | ||||||
| Independent assessments find the body to be independent, impartial and effective. | ||||||
| Independent evaluation of the body’s activities is carried out systematically and the results are published. | ||||||
| Evaluations have revealed effective practice and independence from undue influence. | ||||||
| Findings of evaluations are used for further improvements of the body’s performance. | ||||||
| Dedicated mechanisms of parliamentary and civil society oversight ensure effective public accountability in practice. |
Note that for Bosnia and Herzegovina, “State” stands for the state level, while “FBiH” stands for the Federation of Bosnia and Herzegovina and “RS” stands for Republika Srpska - the two entities of Bosnia and Herzegovina. Note that the presented scoring criteria system is not a full representation of the scoring methodology used to determine the score for an indicator. For more information, see the Methodology section.