Indicator
System governance
Implemented
Not Implemented
Not Applicable
| Level | ALB | BIH | KOS | MNE | MKD | SRB |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| There are structured opportunities for policymakers to discuss evaluations of progress towards achieving education goals. | ||||||
| There is a system that foresees periodic reviews of the education system. | ||||||
| There is some independent research or analysis of education policies. *Not independent | ||||||
| There is an annual public report that analyses the performance of the education system in relation to established goals. *Not annual | ||||||
| A monitoring system is in place to assess the efficiency of the strategy vis-à-vis the implementation plan. | ||||||
| There is a clear indicator framework for monitoring the education system and information is stored in an Education Information Management System (EMIS). *System not fully developed | ||||||
| A national qualifications framework is in place. *Under development | ||||||
| There are clear budget allocations for implementation of activities and budget is not exclusively donor-funded. *A majority of the funding originates from donors | ||||||
| An overarching strategy or vision for the education system is in place. | ||||||
| Information is disseminated publicly and digitally through a platform/dashboard. |
Note that for Bosnia and Herzegovina, “State” stands for the state level, while “FBiH” stands for the Federation of Bosnia and Herzegovina and “RS” stands for Republika Srpska - the two entities of Bosnia and Herzegovina. Note that the presented scoring criteria system is not a full representation of the scoring methodology used to determine the score for an indicator. For more information, see the Methodology section.