Indicator
VET Governance
Implemented
Not Implemented
Not Applicable
| Level | ALB | BIH | KOS | MNE | MKD | SRB |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Learners have access to updated and relevant career guidance and information (e.g., about employability) to make informed decisions about their education and training pathways. | ||||||
| There are statistical tracking mechanisms, consultation processes and evidence from skills surveys that support planning and development of the VET sector . | ||||||
| The VET Governance system monitors trends in VET outcomes (e.g. employability). *Not all trends are monitored | ||||||
| The VET Governance system approves new VET programmes/providers. | ||||||
| The VET Governance system evaluates quality of VET institutions. | ||||||
| The VET Governance system consults systematically with and engages key social partners. | ||||||
| The VET Governance system operates on a clear set of regulations and standards. | ||||||
| There is concrete evidence of preparatory government activity to set up a VET agency or co-ordinate the sector (e.g., a budget has been assigned; there is a draft structure of the agency, etc.). | ||||||
| The monitoring and re-adjustment of VET policy is regular and systematic. | ||||||
| Employers’ representatives deem that incentives for employers’ participation in VET provision are sufficient and there is widespread participation in developing curricula, offering WBL placements and other forms of engagement. *Under development |
Note that for Bosnia and Herzegovina, “State” stands for the state level, while “FBiH” stands for the Federation of Bosnia and Herzegovina and “RS” stands for Republika Srpska - the two entities of Bosnia and Herzegovina. Note that the presented scoring criteria system is not a full representation of the scoring methodology used to determine the score for an indicator. For more information, see the Methodology section.