Indicator
Professionalising state ownership
Implemented
Not Implemented
Not Applicable
| Level | ALB | BIH | KOS | MNE | MKD | SRB |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| The state has fully harmonised ownership practices, including board nomination practices, objectives setting and monitoring, and performance management. | ||||||
| An inter-ministerial committee and/or a specialised body responsible for co-ordinating ownership on a whole-of-government level has been established. *Partially | ||||||
| The responsibilities for regulatory activities and ownership activities have been fully separated for at least the majority of SOEs to ensure that they are not conflicted. *For some SOEs. | ||||||
| Formal information (laws and regulations) is available that clearly establishes the institutional responsibilities for exercising state ownership. | ||||||
| The inter-ministerial committee and/or specialised co-ordination body is adequately resourced with the capacity to effectively carry out its duties. | ||||||
| The government department(s) responsible for state ownership is/are operated on a professional basis and independent from political interference. | ||||||
| The state ownership portfolio is subject to legislative oversight and periodic evaluation. |
Note that for Bosnia and Herzegovina, “State” stands for the state level, while “FBiH” stands for the Federation of Bosnia and Herzegovina and “RS” stands for Republika Srpska - the two entities of Bosnia and Herzegovina. Note that the presented scoring criteria system is not a full representation of the scoring methodology used to determine the score for an indicator. For more information, see the Methodology section.