Indicator
Robust board nomination framework
Implemented
Not Implemented
Not Applicable
| Level | ALB | BIH | KOS | MNE | MKD | SRB |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| A formal board nomination framework is in place. *Not yet in place but under development. | ||||||
| There is a common approach to board nomination processes. *Board nomination processes are assured by ministerial or executive powers and are not transparent. | ||||||
| There are boards of directors for all SOEs. | ||||||
| Public officials nominated to SOE boards are appointed based on clear qualifications and subject to vetting mechanisms. | ||||||
| The board nomination process is transparent and consistent in its application across the SOE portfolio. | ||||||
| The board nomination process clearly specifies the person(s) or body responsible for nominating board members. | ||||||
| The board nomination process is transparent about any qualifications that may be required, or guidelines that existon appointments. | ||||||
| SOE board nominations are subject to a vetting process involving relevant parts of government and/or a specialised body (i.e., commissions or public boards). |
Note that for Bosnia and Herzegovina, “State” stands for the state level, while “FBiH” stands for the Federation of Bosnia and Herzegovina and “RS” stands for Republika Srpska - the two entities of Bosnia and Herzegovina. Note that the presented scoring criteria system is not a full representation of the scoring methodology used to determine the score for an indicator. For more information, see the Methodology section.