Indicator
Privatisation practices
Implemented
Not Implemented
Not Applicable
| Level | ALB | BIH | KOS | MNE | MKD | SRB |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Independent evaluators are responsible to establish company valuations to ensure that privatised entities are sold at fair value. | ||||||
| An independent oversight body, such as a supreme audit institution, ensures that privatisations are undertaken transparently and in the public interest. | ||||||
| Information on ongoing or forthcoming privatisation processes is readily accessible to the public. | ||||||
| The privatisation policy framework includes at least some requirements (e.g. the requirement for public disclosure of planned privatisations and/or the establishment of an oversight commission) to ensure that privatisations are undertaken to some degree transparently and in the public interest. | ||||||
| A national privatisation policy framework is in place. | ||||||
| The privatisation policy framework includes strong and uniform requirements to ensure that privatisations are undertaken transparently and in the public interest. | ||||||
| The institution(s) responsible for privatisations must report to the parliament or other representative bodies regarding planned and ongoing privatisations. | ||||||
| The privatisation policy framework includes measures to overcome any negative effects on privatisations (e.g., on workers and public-service delivery). | ||||||
| Post-privatisation audits are systematically undertaken (e.g., to assess the fulfilment of contractual obligations and/or the impact of privatisations on the public interest). |
Note that for Bosnia and Herzegovina, “State” stands for the state level, while “FBiH” stands for the Federation of Bosnia and Herzegovina and “RS” stands for Republika Srpska - the two entities of Bosnia and Herzegovina. Note that the presented scoring criteria system is not a full representation of the scoring methodology used to determine the score for an indicator. For more information, see the Methodology section.