Indicator
Water supply and sanitation
Implemented
Not Implemented
Not Applicable
Level | ALB | BIH | KOS | MNE | MKD | SRB |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
There is evidence of active policy implementation as measured by programme inputs and outputs of the approved water supply and sanitation policy framework | ||||||
Investments into the new or updated water infrastructure are planned. | ||||||
A policy framework for water supply and sanitation is in place, and public consultations have been conducted for its adoption. *Not yet adopted but under development | ||||||
Local and national government bodies co-ordinate their actions. | ||||||
Measures are taken to reduce water losses in the system. *Planned | ||||||
Water losses through leaks and illegal abstraction is minimal. | ||||||
Monitoring systems are in place to assess the efficiency of water and sanitation policies, programmes and funding. | ||||||
Investments in the new waste treatment facilities are regularly planned, and criteria are aligned with river basin management plans. | ||||||
The operation, maintenance and renewal of water infrastructure are mainly funded by public budgets. | ||||||
Access to water supply and sanitation is continuous and coverage approaches universal. | ||||||
The needs of vulnerable groups of society are considered when assessing water tariffs. *Planned | ||||||
Water supply and sanitation information systems are regularly updated and are publicly available. | ||||||
Strategy or policy measures have undergone an evaluation, drawing on water supply and sanitation data, which informs policy design. |
Note that for Bosnia and Herzegovina, “State” stands for the state level, while “FBiH” stands for the Federation of Bosnia and Herzegovina and “RS” stands for Republika Srpska - the two entities of Bosnia and Herzegovina. Note that the presented scoring criteria system is not a full representation of the scoring methodology used to determine the score for an indicator. For more information, see the Methodology section.