Indicator
Dispute settlement
Implemented
Not Implemented
Not Applicable
| Level | ALB | BIH | KOS | MNE | MKD | SRB |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| The implications of international investment treaties are widely communicated to respective government agencies. | ||||||
| There are mechanisms in place that aim to avoid disputes, such as ombudsman services or mediation. | ||||||
| Investment-state disputes are resolved under investment treaties. | ||||||
| Foreign arbitral awards are generally recognised and enforced by local courts. | ||||||
| Conditions of validity and enforcement of foreign judgments are recognized by national laws. | ||||||
| New York Convention and the International Centre for Settlement of Investment Disputes Convention have been ratified. | ||||||
| Investors have access to a commercial or investment arbitration. | ||||||
| The experience with investment disputes under investment treaties is thoroughly evaluated. |
Note that for Bosnia and Herzegovina, “State” stands for the state level, while “FBiH” stands for the Federation of Bosnia and Herzegovina and “RS” stands for Republika Srpska - the two entities of Bosnia and Herzegovina. Note that the presented scoring criteria system is not a full representation of the scoring methodology used to determine the score for an indicator. For more information, see the Methodology section.