Indicator
Tourism governance
Implemented
Not Implemented
Not Applicable
Level 0
Level 5
| Level | ALB | BIH | KOS | MNE | MKD | SRB |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| The tourism governance structure defines responsible government bodies, budget, and implementation timeframe. | ||||||
| The national tourism strategy has clear strategic priorities, goals, and an action plan. *Not yet in place but under development | ||||||
| An inter-ministerial tourism coordination body is established. | ||||||
| Tourism investment policy is in place with clear measures and incentives for tourism stakeholders. | ||||||
| Tourism innovation policy is in place with clear measures and incentives for tourism stakeholders. *Partially | ||||||
| Sustainable investment in tourism infrastructure is facilitated by the tourism policy framework. | ||||||
| The tourism strategy is in the process of implementation. | ||||||
| Human and financial resources for tourism governance activities are sufficient. | ||||||
| Risk mitigation, crisis management, and emergency response plans are in place. *Not yet in place but under development | ||||||
| Monitoring of visitor numbers and activities is conducted. | ||||||
| Regular monitoring and independent evaluation of tourism investment and innovation policies is in place. *Under development | ||||||
| Regular monitoring and independent evaluation of the tourism governance framework is in place. |
Note that for Bosnia and Herzegovina, “State” stands for the state level, while “FBiH” stands for the Federation of Bosnia and Herzegovina and “RS” stands for Republika Srpska - the two entities of Bosnia and Herzegovina. Note that the presented scoring criteria system is not a full representation of the scoring methodology used to determine the score for an indicator. For more information, see the Methodology section.