Indicator
Public-private dialogue
Implemented
Not Implemented
Not Applicable
| Level | ALB | BIH | KOS | MNE | MKD | SRB |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tourism private sector interests are promoted through relevant representative bodies. | State RS FBiH | |||||
| Pilot public-private partnership framework at the national level is established, fostering dialogue through events like Tourism Forums. | State RS FBiH | |||||
| Public-private partnership framework is established at the national level. *Partly | State RS FBiH | |||||
| Private stakeholders and non-governmental organizations are included in the development and implementation of tourism policies. | State RS FBiH | |||||
| Public-Private Tourism Commission or other formal body is established and operational. | State RS FBiH | |||||
| Regular monitoring and evaluation of the progress and implementation of public-private partnership activities is in place. | State RS FBiH | |||||
| Monitoring results are incorporated in the private partnership framework following the best practices of OECD countries. | State RS FBiH |
Note that for Bosnia and Herzegovina, “State” stands for the state level, while “FBiH” stands for the Federation of Bosnia and Herzegovina and “RS” stands for Republika Srpska - the two entities of Bosnia and Herzegovina. Note that the presented scoring criteria system is not a full representation of the scoring methodology used to determine the score for an indicator. For more information, see the Methodology section.